So much hype going on these days in the world of web standards and interactive media. Apple is in the middle of a full-on Flash-bashing PR blitz, saying Flash is a CPU hog and causes crashes. Open standards advocates continually troll blogs posting that HTML5 can "do anything that Flash can". Adobe seems fairly quiet in what I can assume is preparation for the Creative Suite 5 and FlashPlayer 10.1 salvo. I like that calmness from a personal standpoint, but I fear that famous reality distortion field.

Here are a few points that I see as an animator and, more specifically, as an Adobe shareholder:

Adobe Owns Design Tools

Creating animation, and more importantly, interactive animation, is a difficult thing. One has to create art assets and write code and then assemble them into a singular design. You need a strong authoring environment to give you the flexibility and freedom to be creative. Adobe is the gold standard in authoring environments for all things visual, proven most recently by the celebration of 20 years of Photoshop. Any web/interactive designer I have met (worth their salt) is using Adobe's tools. I have heard a few of these designers complain about the cost of the software, or performance on their older computer, but not about the tools. The design landscape for web or print would be absolutely barren without Adobe's tools.

Adobe Owns Designers

I do not see any development tools for HTML5 or Canvas that I, as a designer, would personally want to use. Actually, the only thing I seem to find is a lot of JavaScript snippets and code libraries. How can we build complex (or even simple) interactive, animated experiences that look good if we don't have some kind of timeline representation in the authoring tool? Am I supposed to use JavaScript to swap out sprites on a timer? Seriously? Sprites? Are we programming arcade games for the 1980s again? Canvas (and any JQuery-esque libraries) are great for core web site functionality, like form validation and image galleries, not for game or rich media development. How willl Canvas or JavaScript-based tools replace Flash on the content generation side without robust authoring tools? Won't Adobe be the first to offer these kinds of tools, in say Dreamweaver?

Does Apple Own Designers?

Here's the big question. Apple is by far the OS/platform of choice for designers. I know that Adobe has found an audience in creatives on a PC platform over the years, but by and large, most would want to work on a Mac over a PC. So assuming designers are essentially fans of both Apple and Adobe as a demographic, who will win their hearts? Apple certainly has clout, but how will Adobe's users take the news that one of their design tools, and possibly some of their own work, as being labeled resource hogs and something that could easily be replaced with a little JavaScript? I am a PC guy, so I don't have this internal conflict, but I am finding this question fascinating. As a Mac-based Flash designer, where is the love right now?

What is Adobe To Do?

Adobe has to keep doing what they are doing, but possibly manage their image in the press a bit more. If FlashPlayer 10.1 delivers the full experience on mobile, then I think Apple will feel serious pressure to allow Flash on their platform. If my Blackberry or an Android phone can deliver a better surfing experience than an iPhone, that will changes the landscape quickly. We see RIM and Google and Palm all embracing Flash as a competitive advantage, so if Adobe delivers, it really could bring the mobile web into parity with regular browsers.

What is a Shareholder to do?

I am buckling down and waiting for the results for FlashPlayer 10.1 and Creative Suite 5. Adobe currently owns their space, and should for the forseeable future. Their customers will find CS5 to be a compelling upgrade, based on what I have seen in sneak peaks already. I know that the CS5 upgrade will look REALLY good to those still using CS3 or earlier versions. So I may have to re-evaluate if the pre-CS5 launch hype drives the price up, but as of right now the plan is to hold for the long term.

OK, I hadn't expected to get too excited about what was going on in content creation software in terms of upcoming releases. Things have been busy here, so I haven't had much time to play with new tools, and to be honest, the current tools are working pretty well. Plus, with budgets being tight and with so much innovation (new features and workflows) in Adobe's Creative Suite 4, I didn't expect to see too much "must have" new features in CS5. However, things look to be heating up for Spring 2010, especially after seeing the list:

http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashcs5/

I have to say I am intrigued. I am not on the edge of my seat excited (yet) but I am very interested in how this early announcement shakes up rich media development. More...

I have been following the recent hullabaloo about HTML 5, how it is a "Flash-killer" and will eliminate the need for plugins. I figured that since I am a Flash user, and I also happen to code web sites in HTML and CSS, I have enough experience and hindsight to make a few salient points. The big question is of course if HTML 5 will render Flash, Silverlight, QuickTime, and all other browser plugins useless or impotent. My answer, for the next 3 to 5 years, is a resounding no. More...

With Adobe’s release of the Flash CS4’s 10.0.2 update last week, my life has gotten significantly less stressful. Armed with this comprehensive update, I can say to users of earlier versions of Flash: "Come on in, the water’s fine!" Flash CS4 is still not perfect, but with this update the balance shifts as the feature and productivity gains found in CS4 outweigh the lingering issues.

Woe is Me!

This next bit may sound like complaining, but it is intended to strike familiar with others who tried Flash CS4 and were wise enough to retreat back to the relative safety and stability of CS3. More...